On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws

Warning The system is temporarily closed to updates for reporting purpose.

Kıbrıs, Özgür and Kıbrıs, Arzu (2010) On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws. [Working Paper / Technical Report] Sabanci University ID:SU_FASS_2010/0007

[thumbnail of Bankruptcy_5_10_10.pdf] PDF
Bankruptcy_5_10_10.pdf

Download (287kB)

Abstract

Axiomatic analysis of bankruptcy problems reveals three major principles: (i) proportionality (PRO), (ii) equal awards (EA), and (iii) equal losses (EL). However, most real life bankruptcy procedures implement only the proportionality principle. We construct a noncooperative investment game to explore whether the explanation lies in the alternative implications of these principles on investment behavior. Our results are as follows (i) EL always induces higher total investment than PRO which in turn induces higher total investment than EA; (ii) PRO always induces higher egalitarian social welfare than both EA and EL in interior equilibria; (iii) PRO induces higher utilitarian social welfare than EL in interior equilibria but its relation to EA depends on the parameter values (however, a numerical analysis shows that on a large part of the parameter space, PRO induces higher utilitarian social welfare than EA).
Item Type: Working Paper / Technical Report
Uncontrolled Keywords: bankruptcy, noncooperative investment game, proportional, equal awards, equal losses, total investment, egalitarian social welfare, utilitarian social welfare.
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Academic programs > Economics
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > Academic programs > Political Science
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Depositing User: Özgür Kıbrıs
Date Deposited: 08 Oct 2010 15:47
Last Modified: 26 Apr 2022 10:48
URI: https://research.sabanciuniv.edu/id/eprint/14704

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item