title
  

A comparative and review study on shape and stress sensing of flat/curved shell geometries using C0-continuous family of iFEM elements

Abdollahzadeh, Mohammadamin and Kefal, Adnan and Yıldız, Mehmet (2020) A comparative and review study on shape and stress sensing of flat/curved shell geometries using C0-continuous family of iFEM elements. Sensors, 20 (14). ISSN 1424-8220

[img]
Preview
PDF (Open Access) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
11Mb

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20143808

Abstract

In this study, we methodologically compare and review the accuracy and performance of C0-continuous flat and curved inverse-shell elements (i.e., iMIN3, iQS4, and iCS8) for inverse finite element method (iFEM) in terms of shape, strain, and stress monitoring, and damage detection on various plane and curved geometries subjected to dierent loading and constraint conditions. For this purpose, four dierent benchmark problems are proposed, namely, a tapered plate, a quarter of a cylindrical shell, a stiened curved plate, and a curved plate with a degraded material region in stiness, representing a damage. The complexity of these test cases is increased systematically to reveal the advantages and shortcomings of the elements under dierent sensor density deployments. The reference displacement solutions and strain-sensor data used in the benchmark problems are established numerically, utilizing direct finite element analysis. After performing shape-, strain-, and stress-sensing analyses, the reference solutions are compared to the reconstructed solutions of iMIN3, iQS4, and iCS8 models. For plane geometries with sparse sensor configurations, these three elements provide rather close reconstructed-displacement fields with slightly more accurate stress sensing using iCS8 than when using iMIN3/iQS4. It is demonstrated on the curved geometry that the cross-diagonal meshing of a quadrilateral element pattern (e.g., leading to four iMIN3 elements) improves the accuracy of the displacement reconstruction as compared to a single-diagonal meshing strategy (e.g., two iMIN3 elements in a quad-shape element) utilizing iMIN3 element. Nevertheless, regardless of any geometry, sensor density, and meshing strategy, iQS4 has better shape and stress-sensing than iMIN3. As the complexity of the problem is elevated, the predictive capabilities of iCS8 element become obviously superior to that of flat inverse-shell elements (e.g., iMIN3 and iQS4) in terms of both shape sensing and damage detection. Comprehensively speaking, we envisage that the set of scrupulously selected test cases proposed herein can be reliable benchmarks for testing/validating/comparing for the features of newly developed inverse elements.

Item Type:Article
Subjects:T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) > TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials
ID Code:40031
Deposited By:Adnan Kefal
Deposited On:19 Jul 2020 10:15
Last Modified:19 Jul 2020 10:15

Repository Staff Only: item control page