Resolving conflicts in action descriptions

Eiter, Thomas and Erdem, Esra and Fink, Michael and Senko, Jan (2006) Resolving conflicts in action descriptions. In: The Seventeenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'06), Riva del Garda, Italy

This is the latest version of this item.

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)


We study resolving conflicts between an action description and a set of conditions (possibly obtained from observations), in the context of action languages. In this formal framework, the meaning of an action description can be represented by a transition diagram—a directed graph whose nodes correspond to states and whose edges correspond to transitions describing action occurrences. This allows us to characterize conflicts by means of states and transitions of the given action description that violate some given conditions. We introduce a basic method to resolve such conflicts by modifying the action description, and discuss how the user can be supported in obtaining more preferred solutions. For that, we identify helpful questions the user may ask (e.g., which specific parts of the action description cause a conflict with some given condition), and we provide answers to them using properties of action descriptions and transition diagrams. Finally, we discuss the computational complexity of these questions in terms of related decision problems.
Item Type: Papers in Conference Proceedings
Additional Information: Proceedings of the Seventeenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'06)
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences
Depositing User: Esra Erdem
Date Deposited: 24 Jun 2007 03:00
Last Modified: 26 Apr 2022 08:30

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item