Cross-listed bonds, information asymmetry and conservatism in credit ratings
Atılgan, Yiğit and Ghosh, Aloke and Yan, Meng and Zhang, Jieying (2015) Cross-listed bonds, information asymmetry and conservatism in credit ratings. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 47 (5). pp. 897-929. ISSN 0022-2879 (Print) 1538-4616 (Online)
This is the latest version of this item.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12232
We propose information asymmetry as an additional explanation for rating conservatism. Because information asymmetry is likely higher for cross-listed bonds than for U.S. bonds, we expect and find that cross-listed bonds are rated more conservatively than U.S. domestic bonds at issuance. Further, cross-listed bonds receive less frequent upgrades and take longer to be upgraded after issuance. Because lower ratings might also reflect higher default risk based on agencies’ private information, we conduct additional tests to discriminate between the rating conservatism and private information explanations. The results are consistent with ratings conservatism and inconsistent with the private information explanation.
Available Versions of this Item
Repository Staff Only: item control page